From: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3) |
Date: | 2012-03-07 14:33:22 |
Message-ID: | 4F5771B2.5070601@lerctr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 3/6/2012 8:32 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Is there any way to get more info out of CLUSTER VERBOSE so it
>> says what index it's working on AFTER the table re-write?
>>
>> INFO: clustering "public.values" using sequential scan and sort
>> INFO: "values": found 0 removable, 260953511 nonremovable row
>> versions in 4224437 pages DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be
>> removed yet. CPU 168.02s/4324.68u sec elapsed 8379.12 sec.
>>
>>
>> And at this point it's doing something(tm), I assume re-doing the
>> indexes.
>>
>> It would be nice(tm) to get more info.
>>
>> Ideas?
>
> Try setting client_min_messages=DEBUG1. At least on current
> sources that gives some additional, relevant output; I think that's
> probably there in 9.1.x as well.
>
Thanks. That helps some, but I'd like to see:
1) these moved up to INFO when CLUSTER VERBOSE
2) time/statistics on each index build
INFO: clustering "public.values" using sequential scan and sort
INFO: "values": found 0 removable, 260953511 nonremovable row
versions in 4224437 pages
DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
CPU 167.57s/4325.52u sec elapsed 7687.28 sec.
DEBUG: building index "values_idx1" on table "values"
DEBUG: building index "values_idx2" on table "values"
DEBUG: building index "values_idx3" on table "values"
DEBUG: building index "values_idx4" on table "values"
DEBUG: building index "values_idx5" on table "values"
DEBUG: building index "values_idx6" on table "values"
DEBUG: building index "values_idx7" on table "values"
DEBUG: building index "values_idx_cluster" on table "values"
CLUSTER
Time: 28997806.474 ms
Comments?
- --
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPV3GyAAoJENC8dtAvA1zmAzkIALJL/Ir7Ks3gYVy4bVB7Oamc
Etpg6/hmM3+g0Ry9Lv3yUbaeHLxwuAaW+Gv5nDuepZFbMfAxYjsUG+fVUu8n3Xo3
V42/4TFxI7QQUtnwqkkMo0Y1vBNsmIRFuxx3b2R+ePKAZaQFLoElU7dL1JOA1u3c
OQ0dUDtiUNTSa+ZrNYNbLhqOUUIooGrF8hWLKfmLOrbrRpAObrCeyaHW2qxRrIq/
wbvHG7YG1byRiDzZr4DNKrS4/88HXjgo2m8xmxyNf+1fKsa69fkIA+rbsqyEx4ui
RAih9fQVQcjcK15XTyDchT21YRdwDZnjVt/Yh0IMvDE19sIQFfrs1QTGPnUULpI=
=5bZG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-07 14:57:41 | Re: CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-03-07 14:26:25 | Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database |