| From: | Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
| Date: | 2012-03-05 13:03:29 |
| Message-ID: | 4F54B9A1.5010206@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2012/03/05 21:05), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2012/03/05 21:00), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> create_index_path builds multiple index paths for a plain relation. How
>> about renaming the function to create_foreign_paths?
>
> I meant "create_foreignscan_paths". I'm sorry about that.
Perhaps you are confusing create_index_path with create_index_paths.
Former creates a IndexScan path node (so it's similar to
create_foreignscan_path), and latter builds multiple IndexScan paths for
a plain relation.
So, just renaming create_foreignscan_path to plural form seems missing
the point.
--
Shigeru Hanada
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-03-05 13:24:28 | Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2012-03-05 12:05:58 | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |