From: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Re: [PERFORM] Re: [PERFORM] Re: [PERFORM] Re: 回复: [PERFORM] PG as in-memory db? How to warm up and re-populate buffers? How to read in all tuples into memory? |
Date: | 2012-03-03 00:30:18 |
Message-ID: | 4F51661A.4090903@fuzzy.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 2.3.2012 03:05, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe. I still am not sure how fsync=off affects the eviction in your
>> opinion. I think it does not (or just very remotely) and you were saying
>> the opposite. IMHO the eviction of (dirty) buffers is either very fast
>> or slow, no matter what the fsync setting is.
>
> I was thinking page cleanup, but if you're confident it doesn't happen
> on a read-only database, I'd have to agree on all your other points.
>
> I have seen a small amount of writes on a read-only devel DB I work
> with, though. Usually in the order of 100kb/s writes per 10mb/s reads
> - I attributed that to page cleanup. In that case, it can add some
> wait time to fsync, even though it's really a slow volume of writes.
> If you're right, I'm thinking, it may be some other thing... atime
> updates maybe, I'd have to check the filesystem configuration I guess.
I'd guess those writes were caused by hint bits (~ page cleanup, but
that's a one-time thing and should be fixed by VACUUM FREEZE right after
the load). Or maybe it was related to runtime stats (i.e. pgstat).
T.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claus Stadler | 2012-03-03 22:43:17 | ...WHERE TRUE" condition in union results in bad query pla |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-02 19:31:00 | Re: Inefficient min/max against partition (ver 9.1.1) |