Re: LIST OWNED BY...

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LIST OWNED BY...
Date: 2012-02-29 18:15:53
Message-ID: 4F4E6B59.6040903@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29-02-2012 14:20, Thom Brown wrote:
> No, the cascade part is fine. It's the objects which won't cause a
> cascade that are an issue. Putting it in a transaction for rolling
> back doesn't help find out what it intends to drop.
>
DROP OWNED BY foo VERBOSE?

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2012-02-29 18:23:29 Re: LIST OWNED BY...
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2012-02-29 18:14:04 Re: COPY with hints, rebirth