From: | Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: swapcache-style cache? |
Date: | 2012-02-29 09:22:05 |
Message-ID: | 4F4DEE3D.40601@opinioni.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/28/2012 08:54 AM, Andrea Suisani wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 04:52 AM, Rob Wultsch wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:31 PM, james<james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Has anyone considered managing a system like the DragonFLY swapcache for a
>>> DBMS like PostgreSQL?
>>>
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=388112370932
>>
>
> in the same vein:
>
> http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/
[cut]
> it was submitted to linux kernel mailing list a bunch of time, the last one:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/10/13
forgot to mention another good write-up
https://lwn.net/Articles/394672/
Andrea
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-02-29 09:28:04 | Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work |
Previous Message | Daniel Farina | 2012-02-29 09:05:01 | Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) |