Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions
Date: 2011-04-26 21:17:58
Message-ID: 4F4ADE2A-02E2-460E-B780-155B04318E5B@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Apr 26, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> wrote:
> Remember the bgworker patches extracted from Postgres-R?

Oh, right. I should have remembered that.

> [ Interestingly enough, one of the complaints I heard back then (not
> necessarily from you) was that there's no user for bgworkers, yet.
> Smells a lot like a chicken and egg problem to me. ]

IIRC, we kind of got stuck on the prerequisite wamalloc patch, and that sunk the whole thing. :-(

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2011-04-26 21:19:02 Re: Bad COMPACT_ALLOC_CHUNK size in tsearch/spell.c?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-26 21:17:48 Re: sequence privileges in information schema