| From: | Tom Allison <tom(at)tacocat(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: power failure.... |
| Date: | 2007-12-03 11:03:40 |
| Message-ID: | 4F4A352E-39CB-4315-AA3D-872FFC0E8B25@tacocat.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I was able to get things up and running OK.
Don't have any WAL that I'm aware of, but it managed to have another
power failure hours later.
I seems that the UPS is more POS than UPS. I think the battery is dead.
On Dec 2, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> change wal_sync_method to open_sync and fsync=on isn't nearly as
>> bad as
>> it sounds.
>
> Just be warned that there's been one report that some Linux
> versions have bugs that make open_sync problematic:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg01310.php
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com
> Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Norberto Delle | 2007-12-03 11:23:48 | Re: Dump/Restore Large Object OID |
| Previous Message | rokj | 2007-12-03 10:50:57 | Re: One or more tables? |