From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro(at)path(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter van Hardenberg <pvh(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: set autovacuum=off |
Date: | 2012-02-23 21:37:54 |
Message-ID: | 4F46B1B2.3050105@pinpointresearch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 02/23/2012 01:07 PM, Alessandro Gagliardi wrote:
> The second one (a bunch of insert statements within a single
> connection). As I mentioned above, I was going to try the temp table
> thing, but that wasn't fast enough. COPY might be my next attempt.
insert into...;
insert into...;
insert into...;
... is really (ignoring statement preparation time):
begin;
insert into...;
commit;
begin;
insert into...;
commit;
begin;
insert into...;
commit;
It's possible that you might get a nice boost by wrapping the inserts
into a transaction:
begin;
insert into...;
insert into...;
insert into...;
...
commit;
This only requires all that disk-intensive stuff that protects your data
once at the end instead of 1000 times for you batch of 1000.
COPY is even better. I just ran a quick test by restoring a table on my
desktop hacking db (untuned, few years old PC, single SATA disk, modest
RAM and lots of resource competition). The 22+ million rows restored in
282 seconds which is a rate somewhat north of 78,000 records/second or
about 0.13ms/record.
You may want to eliminate that trigger, which only seems to exist to
silence errors from uniqueness violations, and copy the incoming data
into a temp table then move the data with a variant of:
INSERT INTO main_table (SELECT ... FROM incoming_table WHERE NOT EXISTS
((SELECT 1 from main_table WHERE ...))
Cheers,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alessandro Gagliardi | 2012-02-23 22:30:37 | Re: set autovacuum=off |
Previous Message | Peter van Hardenberg | 2012-02-23 21:11:14 | Re: set autovacuum=off |