| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Shigeru Hanada *EXTERN*" <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Kohei KaiGai" <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, "Etsuro Fujita" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
| Date: | 2012-02-20 15:58:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4F42193F02000025000458C3@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> I read the example carefully, and it seems to me that it is
> necessary for the read-only transaction (T3) to be SERIALIZABLE so
> that T1 is aborted and the state that T3 saw remains valid.
Correct.
> If I understand right, I agree with your correction.
:-)
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2012-02-20 17:34:21 | Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points |
| Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2012-02-20 15:51:17 | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |