Re: wal_buffers

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wal_buffers
Date: 2012-02-19 14:46:33
Message-ID: 4F410B49.8060702@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19-02-2012 02:24, Robert Haas wrote:
> I have attached tps scatterplots. The obvious conclusion appears to
> be that, with only 16MB of wal_buffers, the buffer "wraps around" with
> some regularity
>
Isn't it useful to print some messages on the log when we have "wrap around"?
In this case, we have an idea that wal_buffers needs to be increased.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-02-19 15:25:55 Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-02-19 13:02:15 Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE