Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c

From: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c
Date: 2012-02-18 20:18:43
Message-ID: 4F4007A3.8000504@wulczer.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18/02/12 21:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> writes:
>> On 18/02/12 20:30, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Dave Malcolm at Red Hat has been working on a static code analysis tool
>>> for Python-related C code. He reports here on some preliminary results
>>> for plpython.c:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795011
>
>> I'll try to fixes these while reworking the I/O functions memory leak
>> patch I sent earlier.
>
> If you find any live bugs, it'd likely be better to deal with them as
> a separate patch so that we can back-patch ...

Sure, I meant to say I'll look at these as well, but will make them into
a separate patch.

Cheers,
Jan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-02-18 20:37:10 Re: Future of our regular expression code
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-02-18 20:17:53 Re: Future of our regular expression code