Re: Fwd: Re: Dynamic update of a date field

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Dynamic update of a date field
Date: 2012-02-16 22:45:18
Message-ID: 4F3D86FE.9060702@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 02/16/12 2:34 PM, David Salisbury wrote:
>
> Would it not be advantageous to replicate information in the above
> form if you wanted to, say, get all records in the month of May, and
> therefore create an index on the month field? I would think that
> would be more efficient than creating a functional index on a timestamp.
> And if you're not too picky, that would give an index that couldn't
> be done on a timestamptz field, as that's mutable.

an index on a timestamp will work just fine on date_trunc('month',
timestampfield)

--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bartosz Dmytrak 2012-02-16 22:47:14 Re: How to dereference 2 dimensional array?
Previous Message David Salisbury 2012-02-16 22:34:21 Fwd: Re: Dynamic update of a date field