On 02/08/2012 11:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I am going to go ahead and commit the patch with the altered json
> results, because IMO it is mere accident that these regression cases
> were coming out with "nice" field labels anyway. When and if Andrew
> gets the RowExpr cases fixed properly, that will show up as these
> cases going back to nicer-looking output.
I take it this is your way of making me hurry up with that work :-)
cheers
andrew