| From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup() |
| Date: | 2012-02-03 02:31:43 |
| Message-ID: | 4F2B470F.5070107@timbira.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02-02-2012 20:06, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> If there is more than one concurrent backup running, which one do you
> return? The first one or the latest one? Or perhaps you need an
> interface thta can return them all...
>
IMHO, pg_is_in_backup() should return true if one or more backup copies are
running. As about returning the backup timestamp, we could return an array
like array[['label_1', '2012-01-28 02:00:01 BRST'], ['label_2', '2012-01-28
03:40:34 BRST']] or NULL if none.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2012-02-03 04:01:11 | Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage |
| Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2012-02-03 01:31:48 | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |