From: | Tulio <tulio(at)informidia(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | parameter "vacuum_defer_cleanup_age" |
Date: | 2012-01-30 18:55:11 |
Message-ID: | 4F26E78F.9000502@informidia.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I have 2 servers, working with Hot-Standby and Streaming Replication...
and when we executed some query much large returns a message..
"canceling statement due to statement timeout"
I want know, how can I calculate the better value to "vacuum_defer_cleanup_age" in my case?
Tell me if you recommend changes in other parameter.
Thanks
--
Túlio Gustavo dos Santos
Adm. Téc. em Banco de Dados - TI
Informídia Pesquisas Esportivas Ltda.
Tel./Fax.: 55 11 3673 5566
Email: tulio(at)informidia(dot)com(dot)br
twitter: @informidia
Web: www.informidia.com.br
Antes de imprimir lembre-se de sua responsabilidade e comprometimento com o Meio Ambiente
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Frankel | 2012-01-30 19:40:48 | restart server on Lion |
Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2012-01-30 18:53:51 | Re: [GENERAL] Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |