From: | Eric Borts <eborts(at)bltek(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dharmendra Goyal <dharmendra(dot)goyal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Windows x86-64 One-Click Install (9.1.2-1, 9.0.6-1) hangs on "initialising the database cluster" (with work-around) |
Date: | 2012-01-28 03:31:14 |
Message-ID: | 4F236C02.2010304@bltek.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 1/27/2012 7:47 PM, Dharmendra Goyal wrote:
> Nice analysis Eric. ANy idea why (which program set this) this
> particular registry was set.
Thanks Dharmendra! It was pretty exhausting.
I haven't a clue how this got changed. I tried goofing around with
shift, ctrl, etc. and I wasn't even able to get an "Open With" option on
the context menu. The only way I found to re-associate the file was:
Control Panel > All Control Panel Items > Default Programs > Set
Associations
Double click .bat
Click Browse
Browse to C:\windows\system32\cmd.exe
Click Open
Select "Virtual Command Shell 9014006604090000"
Click OK
So I doubt I did it manually. As far as what program made that
modification or what steps I went through to get Windows to give me the
option to re-associate a batch file, I don't know.
Now, once the association is set, it's impossible to remove without
editing the registry.
Thanks for spurring me on to find the source of the problem!
E
For kicks, here are a few links where people set the association
manually and were advised to delete the .bat\UserChoice key:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itprogeneral/thread/fc2ca91d-5509-4c9b-92a5-5af19375e361
http://www.computing.net/answers/windows-7/how-to-disassociate-batch-files-from-notepad/5521.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-28 04:11:15 | Re: pgcrypto decrypt_iv() issue |
Previous Message | Dharmendra Goyal | 2012-01-28 02:47:03 | Re: Windows x86-64 One-Click Install (9.1.2-1, 9.0.6-1) hangs on "initialising the database cluster" (with work-around) |