| From: | Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: update with from |
| Date: | 2012-01-23 15:21:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4F1D7AF4.8090604@compulab.co.il |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 01/23/2012 04:34 PM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 23 January 2012 14:48, Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> wrote:
>>> In my tests, if the joined rows are sorted it always updates with the
>>> first row. Does anyone have any other experiences, or should I be
>>> concerned that at some point it will behave differently?
>>
>> I checked my tests again. It always uses the last one, not the first one.
>>
>> Sim
>
> I expect that your records get updated multiple times too.
>
> Perhaps you can use DISTINCT ON in your from-based UPDATE?
>
The select in the from statement (i.e. update.. from (select...) )
returns 2739 records. It updates 617 records.
When I run the update it returns "617 rows affected"
So I'm guessing it is not multiple updates.
Sim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-01-23 15:29:01 | Re: Is Synchronous Postgresql Replication Slower Than Asynchronous? |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-23 15:13:10 | Re: update with from |