Re: HA options

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: HA options
Date: 2012-01-17 21:19:23
Message-ID: 4F15E5DB.3080605@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/17/12 12:33 PM, Tim Uckun wrote:
> I think I am probably going to explore this option first. I don't
> know why automatic failover, failback, etc are not built in already. I
> guess even connection pooling ought to be built in. Seems like
> everybody would need that no?

because you quickly get trapped into OS specific quicksand with these
features.

--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manoj Govindassamy 2012-01-17 21:37:51 Re: PG synchronous replication and unresponsive slave
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2012-01-17 20:56:17 Re: Does Version 9.1 Streaming Replication Supports Multi-Master?