Re: Why is CF 2011-11 still listed as "In Progress"?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is CF 2011-11 still listed as "In Progress"?
Date: 2012-01-09 19:05:40
Message-ID: 4F0B3A84.80202@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/9/12 10:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 09.01.2012 20:37, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Shouldn't it have been closed weeks ago?
>
> There are still patches in "Needs Review" and "Ready for Committer"
> states...

Well, at this point I think we should bump them to CF4. Certainly
nobody is working on those, and CF4 begins in a week.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-01-09 19:45:39 Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-01-09 19:04:59 Re: hiding variable-length fields from Form_pg_* structs