| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage from earlier plperl fix. |
| Date: | 2012-01-06 16:13:40 |
| Message-ID: | 4F071DB4.10107@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 01/06/2012 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of vie ene 06 10:34:30 -0300 2012:
>
>> And yes, we should possibly add a regression test or two. Of course, we can't use the cause of the original complaint ($^V) in them, though.
> Why not? You obviously can't need output it verbatim, but you could
> compare it with a different function that returns $^V stringified by a
> different mechanism.
>
not sure exactly how to in such a way that exercises this code, but feel
free to suggest something ;-)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-06 18:05:09 | pgsql: Fix pg_restore's direct-to-database mode for INSERT-style table |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-01-06 15:49:26 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage from earlier plperl fix. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-06 16:37:25 | Re: Poorly thought out code in vacuum |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-06 16:05:21 | Re: CLOG contention |