Re: PL/Perl Does not Like vstrings

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/Perl Does not Like vstrings
Date: 2012-01-04 21:36:38
Message-ID: 4F04C666.8090905@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/04/2012 03:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 01/04/2012 12:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I looked at that last night but it appeared that SvOK would be perfectly
>>> happy. (Didn't actually try it, though, I was just eyeballing the flags
>>> in gdb.)
>> I tested it and you're right, it doesn't help. I don't see what else we
>> can do about it. There doesn't appear to be any test for an SV in the API.
> I think what's being passed *is* an SV --- at least, the contents look
> reasonable in gdb --- but for some reason SvPVutf8 isn't coping with
> this particular kind of SV. Googling suggests that SvPVutf8 used to
> fail on READONLY SVs, of which this is one if I'm reading the flag bits
> correctly; but that was supposedly fixed years ago. I believe we've hit
> some other undocumented limitation of that function, which the Perl guys
> may or may not acknowledge as a bug once we've tracked it down better.
>
>

Well, the crash is apparently solved by the following, which your
investigation suggested to me:

diff --git a/src/pl/plperl/Util.xs b/src/pl/plperl/Util.xs
index 7d0102b..0785e2e 100644
--- a/src/pl/plperl/Util.xs
+++ b/src/pl/plperl/Util.xs
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ do_util_elog(int level, SV *msg)

PG_TRY();
{
- cmsg = sv2cstr(msg);
+ cmsg = sv2cstr(newSVsv(msg));
elog(level, "%s", cmsg);
pfree(cmsg);
}

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-01-04 22:05:29 Re: PL/Perl Does not Like vstrings
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-01-04 21:34:41 Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes