From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Page Checksums |
Date: | 2011-12-21 19:35:50 |
Message-ID: | 4EF23516.8050904@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/21/2011 10:49 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Leonardo Francalanci (m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it) wrote:
>
>> I think what I meant was: isn't this going to be useless in a couple
>> of years (if, say, btrfs will be available)? Or it actually gives
>> something that FS will never be able to give?
>>
> Yes, it will help you find/address bugs in the filesystem. These things
> are not unheard of...
>
There was a spike in data recovery business here after people started
migrating to ext4. New filesystems are no fun to roll out; some bugs
will only get shaken out when brave early adopters deploy them.
And there's even more radical changes in btrfs, since it wasn't starting
with a fairly robust filesystem as a base. And putting my tin foil hat
on, I don't feel real happy about assuming *the* solution for this issue
in PostgreSQL is the possibility of a filesystem coming one day when
that work is being steered by engineers who work at Oracle.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-12-21 19:43:13 | Re: CLOG contention |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-12-21 19:25:39 | Re: CLOG contention |