From: | Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Walter Hurry <walterhurry(at)lavabit(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: bad block problem |
Date: | 2011-12-08 01:02:15 |
Message-ID: | 4EE00C97.3080905@ringerc.id.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 12/08/2011 08:20 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:20:30 +0000, jkells wrote:
>
>> I am relying on identifying and correcting a bad block.
>
> Well, good luck with that. Most of the time you can't. Just check your
> disk, replace it if necessary, restore from your backup and roll forward.
>
> Oh, you can't do that, since you didn't bother to back up. Never mind.
Unless you're using synchronous replication to clone *every* transaction
on commit to a spare machine, you'll still lose transactions on a
failure no matter how good your backups are.
Even if the OP was doing nightly dumps, they'd be entirely justified in
wanting to try to get a more recent dump on failure.
If they're not backing up at all, yes, that was dumb, but they know that
now. Asking for help isn't unreasonable, and this isn't a stupid "just
google it" question. They've made an effort, posted useful info and log
output, etc. Please don't be too hard on them.
--
Craig Ringer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-12-08 01:05:53 | Re: bad block problem |
Previous Message | Walter Hurry | 2011-12-08 00:20:40 | Re: bad block problem |