Re: High-Concurrency GiST in postgreSQL

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: "C(dot) Mundi" <cmundi(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High-Concurrency GiST in postgreSQL
Date: 2011-12-05 19:26:54
Message-ID: 4EDD1AFE.4020208@squeakycode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/5/2011 12:31 PM, C. Mundi wrote:
>
> Hello. This is my first post. As such, feedback on style and choice of
> venue are especially welcome.
>
> I am a regular but not especially expert user of a variety of databases,
> including postgreSQL.
> I have only modest experience with spatial databases.
>
> I have a new project[1] in which GiST could be very useful, provided I
> can achieve high concurrency.<SNIP>

concurrency here can mean different things. One application hitting PG
which then uses multiple threads? (Not currently possible) Or one app
with multiple threads each having a database connection? (Which is
really the same as) Multiple app's each having a database connection?

PG limits one database connection to one cpu. Multiple connections will
use multiple cpu.

OR, by concurrency, do you mean, non-blocking? And if you mean
non-blocking, is that for read's, write's, or both?

In PG you can do non-blocking, multiple connections (ie multiple cpu),
reads as much as you want.

Extending to indexes: many connections can read a gist index at the same
time. Is that what you need?

-Andy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-12-05 20:00:57 Re: disallow SET WORK_MEM
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-12-05 19:13:58 Re: disallow SET WORK_MEM