On 2011-11-29 18:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-11-29 at 07:07 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On mån, 2011-11-28 at 11:41 +0100, Yeb Havinga wrote:
>>> On 2011-11-15 21:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> Patch attached.
>>> I cannot get the patch to apply, this is the output of patch -p1
>>> --dry-run on HEAD.
>> I need to remerge it against concurrent range type activity.
> New patch attached.
I'm looking at your patch. One thing that puzzled me for a while was
that I could not restrict access to base types (either built-in or user
defined). Is this intentional?
regards,
Yeb Havinga