From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql setenv command |
Date: | 2011-11-26 16:02:10 |
Message-ID: | 4ED10D82.9050105@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/20/2011 11:07 AM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> Updated patch is attached - adding to Nov commitfest.
> Review of the v2 patch:
>
> * Submission Review
> Patch applies with some fuzz and builds without warnings. I noticed
> some tab characters being used in psql-ref.sgml where they shouldn't
> be.
Fixed.
>
> * Coding Review / Nitpicks
> The patch implements \setenv via calls to unsetenv() and putenv(). As
> the comment notes,
>
> | That means we
> | leak a bit of memory here, but not enough to worry about.
>
> which seems true; the man page basically says there's nothing to be
> done about the situation.
>
> The calls to putenv() and unsetenv() are done without any real input
> checking. So this admittedly-pathological case produces surprising
> results:
>
> test=# \setenv foo=bar baz
> test=# \! echo $foo
> bar=baz
>
> Perhaps 'envvar' arguments with a '=' in the argument should just be
> disallowed.
Done that way.
> Also, should the malloc() of newval just use pg_malloc() instead?
Yes, also done.
Revised patch attached.
cheers
andrew
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
setenv.patch | text/x-patch | 3.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Singer | 2011-11-26 16:21:14 | Re: plpython SPI cursors |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-26 15:58:39 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Modify pg_dump to use error-free memory allocation macros. This |