On 11/22/11 7:52 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> But I think performance on that table is going to be pretty bad. I
> suspect that COPY is going to be your friend here.
indeed. 20M rows/hour is 5500 rows/second. you'd better have a
seriously fast disk system, say, 20 15k RPM SAS drives in a RAID10 with
a decent SAS raid controller that has 1GB of writeback battery-or-flash
backed cache.
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast