| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring |
| Date: | 2011-11-15 16:17:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4EC290B2.7080104@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/15/2011 10:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> They were deleted but there are transactions with older snapshots.
> I think vacuum uses the term "nondeletable" or "nonremovable". Not sure
> which one is less bad. Not being a native speaker, they all sound
> horrible to me.
>
I would go more for something like "deadinuse". Saying they are
unremovable isn't very helpful because it doesn't lead the user to
knowing why. If the name gives some suggestion as to why they are
unremovable--in this case that they are still potentially visible and
usable by old queries--that would be a useful naming improvement to me.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2011-11-15 16:24:29 | Re: patch : Allow toast tables to be moved to a different tablespace |
| Previous Message | Julien Tachoires | 2011-11-15 16:08:48 | Re: patch : Allow toast tables to be moved to a different tablespace |