Re: Using incrond for archiving

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using incrond for archiving
Date: 2011-11-14 21:47:00
Message-ID: 4EC137F40200002500042ECC@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com> wrote:

> Why on earth is it sending IN_CLOSE_WRITE messages for 0014, 1145,
> and 0061?

This sounds like it might be another manifestation of something that
confused me a while back:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg01754.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-12/msg00060.php

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shaun Thomas 2011-11-14 21:58:18 Re: Using incrond for archiving
Previous Message Shaun Thomas 2011-11-14 21:33:35 Re: Using incrond for archiving