Re: Fedora 16 note...

From: Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>
To: Jerry Levan <jerry(dot)levan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fedora 16 note...
Date: 2011-11-11 02:56:42
Message-ID: 4EBC8EEA.2030001@ringerc.id.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/10/2011 11:10 PM, Jerry Levan wrote:
> I upgraded to Fedora 16 yesterday…
>
> I thought I might have lost my 12 year old db when the system came up
> and I noticed the 9.1 had overwrote the old binaries.

... of course, you keep regular backups so you weren't too worried
anyway.... right?

> Then I read about pg_upgrade stuff and it worked!

Good to hear. I tend to dump and reload between versions as I have
fairly small data, but it's good to hear people getting successful use
out of pg_upgrade.

> I found that postgresql would not start at boot time until
> I did:
>
> systemctl enable postgresql.service

That's Fedora policy: don't start a service unless the user asks for it
to be started.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2011-11-11 03:18:56 Re: PostgreSQL uninstall fails
Previous Message Mateusz Łoskot 2011-11-11 02:14:18 PQexecParams with binary resultFormat vs BINARY CURSOR