| From: | Robins Tharakan <robins(dot)tharakan(at)comodo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz <postgresql6(at)numerixtechnology(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: GROUP and ORDER BY |
| Date: | 2011-11-08 15:03:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4EB944B6.7030905@comodo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hmmm... Missed that!
I think you are looking for the feature that was introduced in
PostgreSQL 9.1 where you could have a non-group-by column in the select
list, but only if the group-by has a pkey to identify the actual row.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/release-9-1.html
(Search for GROUP BY)
--
Robins Tharakan
On 11/08/2011 03:29 PM, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote:
> Thank you for yuor suggestion, Robins. Unfortunately, it does not work;
> this returns:
> 1787 "Toomyvara" 0.5
> 1787 "Toomevara" 0.4
> 1188 "Toonybara" 0.4
> because while column "no" is identical, "name" isn't and you're
> grouping by both of them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sylvain Mougenot | 2011-11-08 16:04:39 | Re: Partitionning + Trigger and Execute not working as expected |
| Previous Message | tlund79 | 2011-11-08 13:16:53 | Issue with a variable in a function |