From: | Mario Weilguni <roadrunner6(at)gmx(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performance Problem with postgresql 9.03, 8GB RAM,Quadcore Processor Server--Need help!!!!!!! |
Date: | 2011-11-08 12:49:06 |
Message-ID: | 4EB92542.2030502@gmx.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Am 08.11.2011 13:15, schrieb Mohamed Hashim:
> Hi Sam,Tomas
>
> In my first post i have mentioned all how much shared (shared buffers,
> effective cache size, work mem, etc.) and my OS and hardware
> information and what are the basic settings i have changed
>
> and regarding Explain analyze i gave one sample query because if i
> tune that particular table which has records almost 16crore i thought
> my problem will solve...
>
Just curios, are those array items [1] and [2] just samples and you
actually use more which are performance-related (used as condition)? If
just those two are relevant I would change the schema to use real
columns instead. And you seem to use partitioning, but you have no
partition condition?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhidong | 2011-11-08 13:36:06 | Re: IP range in pg_hba.conf? |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-11-08 12:40:25 | Re: Performance Problem with postgresql 9.03, 8GB RAM,Quadcore Processor Server--Need help!!!!!!! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2011-11-08 13:18:18 | Re: SSL encryption makes bytea transfer slow |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-11-08 12:40:25 | Re: Performance Problem with postgresql 9.03, 8GB RAM,Quadcore Processor Server--Need help!!!!!!! |