On 11/07/11 3:30 PM, Edson Richter wrote:
> Thanks for the fast answer. Is there any way to avoid that? I mean, in
> MS SQL Server, I do have "with no_lock" (that produces dirty reads)?
> Or the way to go is the transaction isolation level?
there's no actual overhead in a single statement read transaction like
this. Postgres uses a novel approach to MVCC.
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast