Re: WAL in RAM

From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL in RAM
Date: 2011-10-28 19:55:49
Message-ID: 4EAB08C5.7050206@boreham.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 10/28/2011 12:26 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> For example the Intel 710 SSD has a sequential write speed of 210MB/s,
> while a simple SATA 7.2k drive can write about 50-100 MB/s for less than
> 1/10 of the 710 price.
Bulk data transfer rates mean almost nothing in the context of a database
(unless you're for example backing it up by copying the files to another
machine...)
The key factor typically is small block writes/s (for WAL) and random
small block
reads/s (for data). 710 or similar performance SSDs will deliver on the
order
of 20-50x the performance of a traditional hard drive in these areas.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2011-10-28 21:20:34 Re: backups blocking everything
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2011-10-28 19:09:04 Re: WAL in RAM