Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2011-10-11 17:49:31
Message-ID: 4E9481AB.1020609@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/10/11 9:53 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Or you think that, to keep the backward compatibility completely,
> recovery.conf should be used as not only a configuration file but also a
> recovery trigger one and it should be renamed to recovery.done at
> the end of recovery?

That's precisely my point. The trigger file nature of recovery.conf is
a problem in itself, and I don't see any way to support that and fix it
at the same time. Maybe Simon can?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-10-11 17:51:45 Re: Dumping roles improvements?
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-10-11 17:48:41 Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor