Re: Adding more memory = hugh cpu load

Em 10-10-2011 14:46, Kevin Grittner escreveu:
> alexandre - aldeia digital<adaldeia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Notice that we have no idle % in cpu column.
>
> So they're making full use of all the CPUs they paid for. That in
> itself isn't a problem. Unfortunately you haven't given us nearly
> enough information to know whether there is indeed a problem, or if
> so, what. What was throughput before? What is it now? How has
> latency been affected? And all those unanswered questions from my
> first email....
>
> The problem *might* be something along the lines of most of the
> discussion on the thread. It might not be. I just don't know yet,
> myself.

From the point of view of the client, the question is simple: until the
last friday (with 16 GB of RAM), the load average of server rarely
surpasses 4. Nothing change in normal database use.

Tonight, we will remove the extra memory. :/

Best regards.