| From: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters |
| Date: | 2011-10-07 14:56:21 |
| Message-ID: | 4E8F1315.70109@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2011-10-07 12:21, Yeb Havinga wrote:
> On 2011-10-06 16:04, Royce Ausburn wrote:
>> Initial Review for patch:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00744.php
>
>
> Again, thank you very much for your thorough review. I'll update the
> patch so mixing positional and named parameters are removed, add
> documentation, and give syntax errors before an error message
> indicating that positional and named parameters were mixed.
>
Attach is v2 of the patch.
Mixed notation now raises an error.
In contrast with what I said above, named parameter related errors are
thrown before any syntax errors. I tested with raising syntax errors
first but the resulting code was a bit more ugly and the sql checking
under a error condition (i.e. double named parameter error means there
is one parameter in short) was causing serious errors.
Documentation was also added, regression tests updated.
regards,
--
Yeb Havinga
http://www.mgrid.net/
Mastering Medical Data
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| cursornamedparameter-v2.patch | text/x-patch | 14.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh | 2011-10-07 15:04:59 | SET variable - Permission issues |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-07 14:00:01 | Re: Why does WAL_DEBUG macro need to be defined by default? |