Re: Collection of small fixes to binary transfer code and unit tests

From: Mikko Tiihonen <mikko(dot)tiihonen(at)nitorcreations(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Collection of small fixes to binary transfer code and unit tests
Date: 2011-09-29 23:12:16
Message-ID: 4E84FB50.2000000@nitorcreations.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 09/29/2011 07:10 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Interestingly I do not see these errors when I run the test inside of
> eclipse, but I do when I run it from ant.

The build.xml forces binary transfers by default.
(maybe we should alter it to run all tests twice, once with binary transfer enabled, another with disabled?)

> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Dave Cramer<pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Mikko,
>>
>> I get the following errors after applying your patch.
>>
>> [junit] Testcase:
>> testMaxFieldSize(org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.ResultSetTest):
>> FAILED
>> [junit] null expected:<[12345]> but was:<[09]>
>> [junit] junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: null expected:<[12345]>
>> but was:<[09]>
>> [junit] at
>> org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.ResultSetTest.testMaxFieldSize(ResultSetTest.java:174)

Are you sure you applied the binary-fix-maxfieldlength-test.patch - the above failure looks like what it is trying to fix.

>> [junit] Testcase:
>> testGetTimestampWTZ(org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest):
>> FAILED
>> [junit] expected:<2000-07-07 11:00:00.123> but was:<2000-07-07
>> 11:00:00.122999>
>> [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<2000-07-07
>> 11:00:00.123> but was:<2000-07-07 11:00:00.122999>
>> [junit] at
>> org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.timestampTestWTZ(TimestampTest.java:436)
>> [junit] at
>> org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.testGetTimestampWTZ(TimestampTest.java:188)
>> [junit]
>> [junit]
>> [junit] Testcase:
>> testSetTimestampWTZ(org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest):
>> FAILED
>> [junit] expected:<2000-07-07 11:00:00.123> but was:<2000-07-07
>> 11:00:00.122999>
>> [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<2000-07-07
>> 11:00:00.123> but was:<2000-07-07 11:00:00.122999>
>> [junit] at
>> org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.timestampTestWTZ(TimestampTest.java:436)
>> [junit] at
>> org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.testSetTimestampWTZ(TimestampTest.java:258)

This is quite interesting: Expected <2000-07-07 11:00:00.123> but was:<2000-07-07 11:00:00.122999>
It looks like a rounding error. Do you happen to have integer datetime disabled in backend (which means
that it is using float8 internally to store the time).

-Mikko

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Strunz 2011-09-30 06:13:47 metadata.getColumns() using Apache Tomcat / jndi
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2011-09-29 16:10:52 Re: Collection of small fixes to binary transfer code and unit tests