Re: citext operator precedence fix

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: citext operator precedence fix
Date: 2011-09-22 00:30:01
Message-ID: 4E7A8189.9060602@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I think you'll find that's easier said than done (problem 1 is going to
> be ambiguity,

Ambiguity?

> and problem 2 is going to be that comparisons involving
> these operators won't get indexed).

Yeah, that's acceptable, since it's not any worse than the behavior of
the comparisons now.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2011-09-22 00:31:45 Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-09-22 00:09:02 Re: citext operator precedence fix