From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CUDA Sorting |
Date: | 2011-09-19 14:36:37 |
Message-ID: | 4E775375.3020009@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/19/2011 10:12 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> With the GPU I'm curious to see how well
> it handles multiple processes contending for resources, it might be a
> flashy feature that gets lots of attention but might not really be
> very useful in practice. But it would be very interesting to see.
>
The main problem here is that the sort of hardware commonly used for
production database servers doesn't have any serious enough GPU to
support CUDA/OpenCL available. The very clear trend now is that all
systems other than gaming ones ship with motherboard graphics chipsets
more than powerful enough for any task but that. I just checked the 5
most popular configurations of server I see my customers deploy
PostgreSQL onto (a mix of Dell and HP units), and you don't get a
serious GPU from any of them.
Intel's next generation Ivy Bridge chipset, expected for the spring of
2012, is going to add support for OpenCL to the built-in motherboard
GPU. We may eventually see that trickle into the server hardware side
of things too.
I've never seen a PostgreSQL server capable of running CUDA, and I don't
expect that to change.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2011-09-19 14:48:04 | Generating a query that never returns |
Previous Message | Enrico Pirozzi | 2011-09-19 14:34:39 | A little pg_dump patch |