REVIEW Single pass vacuum - take 2

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: REVIEW Single pass vacuum - take 2
Date: 2011-09-07 02:58:48
Message-ID: 4E66DDE8.7080007@squeakycode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/22/2011 01:22 AM, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is a revised patch based on our earlier discussion. I implemented
> Robert's idea of tracking the vacuum generation number in the line
> pointer itself. For LP_DEAD line pointers, the lp_off/lp_len is unused
> (and always set to 0 for heap tuples). We use those 30 bits to store
> the generation number of the vacuum which would have potentially
> removed the corresponding index pointers, if the vacuum finished
> successfully. The pg_class information is used to know the status of
> the vacuum, whether it failed or succeeded. 30-bit numbers are large
> enough that we can ignore any wrap-around related issues. With this
> change, we don't need any additional header or special space in the
> page which was one of the main objection to the previous version.
>
> Other than this major change, I have added code commentary at relevant
> places and also fixed the item.h comments to reflect the change. I
> think the patch is ready for a serious review now.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan
>

Hi Pavan, I tried to apply your patch to git master (as of just now) and it failed. I assume that's what I should be checking out, right?

-Andy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2011-09-07 03:03:59 Re: memory-related bugs
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-09-07 02:11:54 Re: postgresql.conf archive_command example