From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |
Date: | 2011-09-02 23:42:41 |
Message-ID: | 4E6169F1.3080203@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/02/2011 06:37 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2011-09-02 at 16:00 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Basically the idea is to stash away build and data dirs (after we've run
>> regression, PL and contrib testing) for stable branches (via a command
>> line option) and then test upgrading them. A trial run on the first part
>> is currently running. Once I have that sorted out I'll work on the
>> testing bit ;-)
> It won't work, unless you have a solution for fixing the paths of the
> shared library modules used by the regression tests.
Well, we could drop those functions and not run tests that require them.
Or we could possibly install the libraries in $libdir and hack pg_proc
accordingly. We'd have to install them on both the source and
destination branches, of course.
Maybe people can think of other possible solutions too. I don't think we
should give up in this too easily.
Maybe we need to develop a test db specifically for pg_upgrade anyway.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-02 23:49:12 | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-09-02 22:50:31 | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |