From: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tore Halvorsen <tore(dot)halvorsen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index usage on OR queries |
Date: | 2011-08-31 14:49:35 |
Message-ID: | 4E5E49FF.7030603@squeakycode.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/31/2011 9:35 AM, Tore Halvorsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to optimize a query where I have two tables that both have a
> timestamp column. I want the result where either of the timestamps is
> after a specified time. In a reduced form, like this:
>
>
> CREATE TABLE a
> (
> id serial NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
> time timestamp without time zone NOT NULL DEFAULT now()
> );
>
> CREATE INDEX a_time_idx ON a USING btree (time DESC NULLS LAST);
>
> CREATE TABLE b
> (
> id serial NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
> time timestamp without time zone NOT NULL DEFAULT now()
> );
>
> CREATE INDEX b_time_idx ON b USING btree (time DESC NULLS LAST);
>
> --- generate some data
> insert into a(time)
> select now() - '10 year'::interval * random() from generate_series(1,
> 1000000, 1);
>
> insert into b(time)
> select now() - '10 year'::interval * random() from generate_series(1,
> 1000000, 1);
>
> -- Using constraint works as expected, and uses the time index.
> select * from a join b using(id)
> where a.time >= '2011-08-15';
>
> -- ... both ways...
> select * from a join b using(id)
> where b.time >= '2011-08-15';
>
> -- However, if I'm trying to do this for both times at once, the time
> index is not used at all
> select * from a join b using(id)
> where a.time >= '2011-08-15' OR b.time >= '2011-08-01'
>
> -- This can be optimized by using CTEs
> with am as (
> select * from a where time >= '2011-08-15'
> )
> , bm as (
> select * from b where time >= '2011-08-15'
> )
> select * from am join bm using(id)
>
> -- end
>
> I'm just wondering why the optimizer does things the way it does - and
> if the CTE version is the best way to go...
>
> The actual case is slightly more complex and uses more tables - this is
> mostly a way to find updated data.
>
> --
> Eld på åren og sol på eng gjer mannen fegen og fjåg. [Jøtul]
> <demo> 2011 Tore Halvorsen || +052 0553034554
On PG 9, after I ANALYZED the tables, it used indexes:
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merge Join (cost=1.59..82778.35 rows=13171 width=20) (actual
time=0.066..1076.616 rows=12966 loops=1)
Merge Cond: (a.id = b.id)
Join Filter: ((a."time" >= '2011-08-15 00:00:00'::timestamp without
time zone) OR (b."time" >= '2011-08-01 0
-> Index Scan using a_pkey on a (cost=0.00..31389.36 rows=1000000
width=12) (actual time=0.007..204.856 ro
-> Index Scan using b_pkey on b (cost=0.00..31389.36 rows=1000000
width=12) (actual time=0.006..224.189 ro
ANALYZE is the magic.
-Andy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tore Halvorsen | 2011-08-31 14:53:54 | Re: Index usage on OR queries |
Previous Message | Jeff Ross | 2011-08-31 14:46:30 | Re: FATAL: terminating connection due to conflict with recovery |