From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Whether the function exists a in pgsql table or not? |
Date: | 2011-08-29 03:00:35 |
Message-ID: | 4E5B00D3.9090904@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 08/27/2011 01:21 PM, shuaixf wrote:
> In Oracle, when the table has few records, used frequently, it would use
> "storage(buffer_pool keep)" to keep the data in cache instead of LRU
> algorithm.
>
> if the function exists in a pgsql table or not?
>
There aren't any controls to pin a table into memory in PostgreSQL. The
way the database uses both its dedicated buffer cache as well as the OS
one, it's hard to even define such a UI that would make sense--the
database doesn't have any control or interaction with the OS cache.
The mechanism for deciding what stays in the PostgreSQL cache is a bit
more complicated than an LRU, while the one in the OS probably is a
LRU. If the table is used frequently, it's very likely to stay in one
of the two caches anyway.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adarsh Sharma | 2011-08-29 04:33:27 | Get data back after drop Command |
Previous Message | Lonni J Friedman | 2011-08-29 01:57:57 | Re: pg_restore with -j fails (works without -j option) |