From: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Joy Smith <freestuffanddeals(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "UNION ALL" is failing |
Date: | 2011-08-28 05:38:49 |
Message-ID: | 4E59D469.80509@darrenduncan.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
The whole point of "with" is to factor out redundancy, and yet here you are
going and repeating the 2 "with" declarations; also the declarations have the
same names, which would be a problem, besides being redundant.
Try it like this instead:
with ...
(select ...)
union all
(select ...)
order by node
But moreover, I think you can avoid the union and doubled main selects, by
saying this instead:
with a as
(
select channel,node,accesses from storage where monthly = '11-06'
),
b as
(
select channel,node,accesses from storage where monthly = '11-07'
)
select
b.node
from a right join b on a.node=b.node
where a.accesses is null and b.channel in ('611 IVR', 'olam')
order by node
-- Darren Duncan
Joy Smith wrote:
> with a as
> (
> select channel,node,accesses from storage where monthly = '11-06'
> ),
> b as
> (
> select channel,node,accesses from storage where monthly = '11-07'
> )
>
> select
> b.node
> from a right join b on a.node=b.node
> where a.accesses is null and b.channel = ('611 IVR')
> order by node
>
>
> UNION ALL
>
>
> with a as
> (
> select channel,node,accesses from storage where monthly = '11-06'
> ),
> b as
> (
> select channel,node,accesses from storage where monthly = '11-07'
> )
>
>
> select
> b.node
> from a right join b on a.node=b.node
> where a.accesses is null and b.channel = 'olam'
> order by node
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pasman pasmański | 2011-08-28 05:53:33 | Re: Problem importing a csv file |
Previous Message | planas | 2011-08-28 05:03:53 | Problem importing a csv file |