Re: Questions and experiences writing a Foreign Data Wrapper

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Questions and experiences writing a Foreign Data Wrapper
Date: 2011-08-26 13:53:01
Message-ID: 4E57A53D.7040405@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/26/2011 07:27 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> I wrote:
>> I wrote a FDW for Oracle to a) learn some server coding
>> and b) see how well the FDW API works for me.
> I have released the software on PgFoundry:
> http://oracle-fdw.projects.postgresql.org/
>
> Would it make sense to mention that in chapter 5.10
> of the documentation?
>
>

I don't think so, any more than any other external module should be
mentioned in the docs. There are known FDWs for several well known
external databases, several file formats, and more exotic data sources
such as twitter. I don't think we want to maintain a list of these in
the docs.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-08-26 14:09:05 Re: Questions and experiences writing a Foreign Data Wrapper
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-08-26 13:43:28 Re: tsvector concatenation - backend crash