| From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost |
| Date: | 2011-08-18 10:27:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4E4CE914.7010603@timbira.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em 18-08-2011 03:39, Magnus Hagander escreveu:
> Also, unrelated to that, wouldn't this information be interesting for
> non-autovacuum queries as well?
>
Yes, it would. AFAICS, the patch will display that message in process titles.
However, analyze code also uses the vacuum_delay_point(). How do you handle it?
It would be another patch... autovacuum has an option to display summarized
information but vacuum don't. Isn't it time to be symmetrical here?
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2011-08-18 11:02:52 | vacuum rusage fix |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-08-18 09:49:44 | Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost |