From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ |
Date: | 2011-08-18 07:07:51 |
Message-ID: | 4E4CBA47.5070600@catalyst.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 18/08/11 17:35, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 18/08/2011 11:48 AM, Ogden wrote:
>> Isn't this very dangerous? I have the Dell PERC H700 card - I see
>> that it has 512Mb Cache. Is this the same thing and good enough to
>> switch to nobarrier? Just worried if a sudden power shut down, then
>> data can be lost on this option.
>>
>>
> Yeah, I'm confused by that too. Shouldn't a write barrier flush data
> to persistent storage - in this case, the RAID card's battery backed
> cache? Why would it force a RAID controller cache flush to disk, too?
>
>
If the card's cache has a battery, then the cache is preserved in the
advent of crash/power loss etc - provided it has enough charge, so
setting 'writeback' property on arrays is safe. The PERC/SERVERRAID
cards I'm familiar (LSI Megaraid rebranded models) all switch to
write-though mode if they detect the battery is dangerously discharged
so this is not normally a problem (but commit/fsync performance will
fall off a cliff when this happens)!
Cheers
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-08-18 08:52:01 | Re: tunning strategy needed |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-08-18 05:45:48 | Re: tunning strategy needed |