| From: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using Postgresql as application server |
| Date: | 2011-08-16 04:04:29 |
| Message-ID: | 4E49EC4D.1090707@darrenduncan.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Chris Travers wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> wrote:
>> I believe we basically have all the foundation already, with maybe
>> procedures executable outside transactions being the last major part.
>>
> Why is this desirable? Why is it more desirable than actually using
> the listen/notify infrastructure that exists already?
Maybe listen/notify is sufficient by itself. I withdraw my "procedures
executable outside transactions" comment for now, and just bring it up later if
I can think of a specific use case that other mechanisms don't satisfy. --
Darren Duncan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Venkat Balaji | 2011-08-16 05:05:11 | Re: Postgresql 9.0.1 installation error |
| Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2011-08-16 02:10:30 | Re: Using Postgresql as application server |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-08-16 04:34:28 | Re: streaming replication: one problem & several questions |
| Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2011-08-16 02:10:30 | Re: Using Postgresql as application server |