| From: | Musall Maik <lists(at)musall(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Slaves show different results for query |
| Date: | 2015-05-20 14:09:51 |
| Message-ID: | 4E49B536-3E95-4EB2-9614-F4EE2C9B4EF4@musall.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom,
that's very useful information. Very cool to get such results so quickly here.
Thanks
Maik
> Am 20.05.2015 um 16:05 schrieb Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>
> Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
>> The reason I ask is that the machine you are having problems with has OS
>> X. Over the years I have seen quite a few reports on this list of OS X
>> locale/encoding issues.
>
> Yes. Here's the problem: OS X UTF8 locales (other than C) don't sort the
> same as UTF8 locales on Linux. Because of this, the index created by the
> master is effectively corrupt from the standpoint of the OS X slave; it's
> not in the correct sort order. It might sometimes find the right results
> anyway, but often not.
>
> You might be able to get away with the described configuration if you
> recreate the database using C locale, but personally I wouldn't risk it.
> Masters and slaves in a WAL-shipping replication configuration should be
> on substantially identical platforms, else you're just asking for trouble.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ravi Krishna | 2015-05-20 15:23:51 | Re: [GENERAL] Does PG support bulk operation in embedded C |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-20 14:05:12 | Re: Slaves show different results for query |